<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Berry Reporter - Latest Comments in T-Mobile Re-Words Data Capping Statement</title><link>http://berryreporter.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://berryreporter.disqus.com/t_mobile_re_words_data_capping_statement/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:38:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: T-Mobile Re-Words Data Capping Statement</title><link>http://www.berryreporter.com/t-mobile-re-words-data-capping-statement#comment-10967831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Thomas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your partner Steve emailed me about this yesterday about the 1GB cap as T-Mobile quickly rectified it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My sense as here in San Diego as we just got 3G last week is that the system will get overloaded so it was a smart preemptive move by T-Mobile to set a cap, but the wording revisement was a better PR move to accomplish the same thing in an ambigious way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;,Michael Martin&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.googleandblog.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.googleandblog.com/"&gt;http://www.googleandblog.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:38:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>